Open Doors, Struggles, Power of Published

Social unrest, mobility, and economic opportunities birthed
fresh possibilities for personal identity at the end of the feudal age. Within this
context emerged the first extant autobiography written in English, The Book of Margery Kempe. Kempe recorded her personal experiences,
leaving a journal of her spiritual and everyday life.
The context
of the Reformation and Renaissance enabled the writing of female autobiographies to emerge
as mirrors and testimonies for readers. Females
were able to tell their personal stories as looking glasses for others. In 1591, A Christal Glasse, was a popular narrative account
of the life and death of Katherine Stubbes. It
was published by Stubbes husband, as a
mirror of woman-hood [and]
a perfect pattern of true Christianity.(Stubbes
1591)
Females continued in
succeeding centuries to produce autobiographies but more often in unpublished forms. Publication of their
autobiographies was problematic. Published autobiographies by male authors were more
accepted and respected. Females and their autobiographies often were not taken seriously
in male-dominated cultures. Women who published their writing in the
1700s-1900s were exceptional.
Male
experience was considered normative. Females spoke tentatively from outside the dominant
male framework. Womens autobiographies
commonly were considered insignificant, idiosyncratic, or tedious. There was a basic
resistance to valuing womens experience. Male autobiographies found a place of
privilege, while female autobiographies were devalued.
(Smith 1987:16) There was a fundamental distrust and resistance to womens public
voice.
Literate,
educated women of the Reformation and Renaissance found themselves within a new, but
limited, world of discourse. There was a new sphere of freedom and opportunity for female,
individual expression; but it was within prescribed scripts, such as that of the unmarried
virgin, the wife, the nun, or the queen. Most women were to remain silent in public. Most
women autobiographers wrote letters, diaries, and journals and stayed in their domestic
place, out of public discourse.
Female writers who had a privileged social status were more likely to write
autobiographies in literal language. Others without privileged status often wrote in
figurative language. Those female autobiographers, who were bold enough to enter the world
of public discourse, moved into it from a disadvantaged societal position. Their
autobiographies often became heretic narratives.
(Smith 1987:43)
The factor of
minority ethnicity further compounded the marginalization of published autobiographies by
women.
It
is an unhappy fact that association with a
"sub-culture" has, with
occasional exception, relegated
a writer to less than full
writers status
(Olsen, in Tate 1983:x)
The public lives of female autobiographers
of cultural minorities have been especially complex. They have suffered double or triple
layers of others misrepresentations and stereotypes.
written about her
rather than by her. Moreover, her non-presence, her unrepresentability, presses
even more imperiously
yet elusively on her; and her position as speaker before an audience becomes
even more precarious.
(Smith 1987:51)
Maya Angelou
was cautious with her published autobiographies, seeking to carefully influence her
audience:
She stages her own alienated
relationship to her
reader, knowing full well that the reader
must be conned into
believing that she has a privileged relation to an autobiographical truth
The
double voiced nature of Angelous text allows her to oppose an
oppressive social system without risk
of becoming a term within that
system
(Lionnet 1989:163)
Contact Dr.
Howard
Professional Resume |
Professional Vitae |
Performance
Resume |
Publications/Presentations
|Performance/Communication Curricula
|
Perf. St.
Syllabi
Professional Network|
Public Speaking/Presenting |
Professional
Projects |
Professional Communication Guidelines
|
Performances of
Autobio.
&
Lit. |
Home